Compass is still being developed and is effectively in beta. Some content and features may be incomplete, change, or not work as expected.

Content is anchored to trusted sources where available, but Compass has not yet been clinically reviewed. It provides general information rather than medical advice.

Feedback helps us identify gaps, errors, usability problems and opportunities to improve Compass over time.

How Compass is developedGive feedback

A review finds poor subjective sleep quality is common in ALS

Original source

Subjective sleep quality in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener · 5 March 2026 (opens in a new tab)

Compass summarised this from the study's abstract.

Study details

Study type
Systematic review
Studied in
Human

Article

View article on the publisher's site (opens in a new tab)via the publisher — full text availability varies

A systematic review and meta-analysis found that 56.7% of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) had poor subjective sleep quality. Across 23 studies involving 1,899 people with ALS, average Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores exceeded the clinical cutoff for poor sleep. People with ALS also reported worse sleep quality than healthy controls.

Why this matters

Sleep problems may affect many people with ALS and were associated with factors including depression, anxiety, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, constipation and cognitive impairment. The findings support systematic sleep screening and proactive management, but this review did not show that any particular treatment improves sleep or other outcomes.

Limitations and context

This was a review of observational assessments using patient-reported sleep measures; 20 of the 23 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The findings describe subjective sleep quality and associations, not treatment effects or proof that the associated factors cause poor sleep. The review searched studies published through August 2025, and meta-regression did not find significant associations with age, sex, disease duration or ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised scores.

Summarised by Compass 16 August 2026

This summary was generated by AI from the source listed above. It is not medical advice, so read the original source for anything that affects your care.

Bibliographic data from PubMed is courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Compass does not reproduce source abstracts and may not reflect the most current record.

Relevant to you?